Congressman Joe Courtney was elected in 2006 to represent the Second Congressional District of Connecticut in the House of Representatives. He serves on the House Armed Services Committee, and House Education and Labor Committee.
Congressman Courtney is the Chairman of the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces. According to a review by House Historians Office, Courtney is the first known member from Connecticut to lead a naval oversight panel in the House of Representatives since 1873, when Stephen W. Kellogg of Waterbury served as Chair of the Committee on Expenditures in the Navy Department in the 42nd Congress (1871-1873). Prior to that, Samuel Ingham, a two-term Congressman with connections to Hebron, Jewett City (Griswold) and Essex, served as chair of the Committee on Navy Affairs in the 25th Congress (1837-1839).
In addition, he co-chairs the bipartisan Congressional Shipbuilding Caucus along with Rep. Rob Wittman of Virginia. As a member of the House Education and Labor Committee, he serves on the Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions subcommittee, as well as the Higher Education and Workforce Training subcommittee.
As a senior member of the Armed Services Committee, Congressman Courtney has worked to strengthen our nation’s defense by leading the call for increased submarine production. When Courtney arrived in Congress, Electric Boat was facing significant workforce reductions, and, for the first time in 50 years, was not actively designing the next generation of submarine. Because of funding secured by Courtney through his committee work, the men and women of Electric Boat have been building two submarines per year since 2011. In addition, Courtney has secured critical resources for new design and engineering work on the replacement for the OHIO-class submarine, which has added thousands of jobs in southeastern Connecticut. This design and engineering work prompted Electric Boat to expand into the former Pfizer building in New London to accommodate its growing workforce.
-
Rate his overall performance as an elected official
-
Totally Disapprove. He's Terrible
-
I really don't care... I'm Neutral
-
I approve! He's doing a great job.
1 votes -
-
He properly represents my views on Abortion Rights
-
Nope! He doesn't get me
-
Meh. Whatever, don't care
-
Yep! He totally gets me
2 votes -
-
He properly represents my views on Balancing the Budget
-
Nope! He doesn't get me
-
Meh. Whatever, don't care
-
Yep! He totally gets me
2 votes -
-
He properly represents my views on the Gun Rights (2nd Amendment)
-
Nope! He doesn't get me
-
Meh. Whatever, don't care
-
Yep! He totally gets me
2 votes -
-
He properly represents my views on Military & Defense Spending
-
Nope! He doesn't get me
-
Meh. Whatever, don't care
-
Yep! He totally gets me
2 votes -
-
He properly represents my views on the Economy
-
Nope! He doesn't get me
-
Meh. Whatever, don't care
-
Yep! He totally gets me
2 votes -
-
He properly represents my views on Education
-
Nope! He doesn't get me
-
Meh. Whatever, don't care
-
Yep! He totally gets me
2 votes -
-
He properly represents my views on Healthcare
-
Nope! He doesn't get me
-
Meh. Whatever, don't care
-
Yep! He totally gets me
2 votes -
-
He properly represents my position on Immigration
-
Nope! He doesn't get me
-
Meh. Whatever, don't care
-
Yep! He totally gets me
2 votes -
-
He properly represents my views on Energy Policy
-
Nope! He doesn't get me
-
Meh. Whatever, don't care
-
Yep! He totally gets me
2 votes -
-
He properly represents my views on Environmental matters
-
Nope! He doesn't get me
-
Meh. Whatever, don't care
-
Yep! He totally gets me
2 votes -
-
He properly represents my views on Crime and Law Enforcement
-
Nope! He doesn't get me
-
Meh. Whatever, don't care
-
Yep! He totally gets me
2 votes -
-
He properly represents my views on National Security
-
Nope! He doesn't get me
-
Meh. Whatever, don't care
-
Yep! He totally gets me
2 votes -
-
If he runs for office again, I would vote for him
-
Uhhh, No chance!
-
Heck Yeah!
2 votes -