477

John’s attraction to public service took him to Washington, D.C., to work for that sports enthusiast and then-U.S. Sen. Jim Abdnor. He then served at the Small Business Administration under an appointment from President Ronald Reagan.

In 1989, John and his family returned to South Dakota, where he served as the executive director of the South Dakota Republican Party. In 1991, then-Gov. George S. Mickelson appointed him to be state railroad director, a position he held until 1993, when he became executive director of the South Dakota Municipal League.

In 1996, with a shoestring budget and the support of family and friends, John won his first term as South Dakota’s lone member of the U.S. House of Representatives. John was re-elected to a second term by the largest margin in South Dakota history. He returned again to Washington in 2001 to serve his third term in the House.

John then honored his 1996 campaign pledge to serve only three terms in the House. After a narrow loss in a U.S. Senate race in 2002, he won his current Senate seat in 2004, when he made history by defeating a sitting Senate party leader for the first time in 52 years.

In 2010, John was elected to serve a second term in the Senate in a rare unopposed race. He was only the third Republican and the only South Dakotan to run unopposed for the Senate since direct elections were created in 1913. John was elected to a third term in 2016.

For the 117th Congress, John serves on the Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee; the Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee; and the Finance Committee. He serves as ranking member of the Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Communications, Media, and Broadband and ranking member of the Finance Committee’s Subcommittee on Taxation and IRS Oversight. He also serves as the Senate Republican whip, the number two position in Senate Republican leadership, and has previously served as chairman of the Senate Republican Policy Committee from 2009–2011 and chairman of the Senate Republican Conference from 2012-2018.

  1. Rate his overall performance as an elected official

    1. Totally Disapprove. He's Terrible
    2. I really don't care... I'm Neutral
    3. I approve! He's doing a great job.
    1 votes
    Share Your Result
  2. He properly represents my views on Abortion Rights

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  3. He properly represents my views on Balancing the Budget

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  4. He properly represents my views on the Gun Rights (2nd Amendment)

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  5. He properly represents my views on Military & Defense Spending

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  6. He properly represents my views on the Economy

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  7. He properly represents my views on Education

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  8. He properly represents my views on Healthcare

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  9. He properly represents my position on Immigration

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  10. He properly represents my views on Energy Policy

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  11. He properly represents my views on Environmental matters

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  12. He properly represents my views on Crime and Law Enforcement

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  13. He properly represents my views on National Security

    1. Nope! He doesn't get me
    2. Meh. Whatever, don't care
    3. Yep! He totally gets me
    2 votes
    Share Your Result
  14. If he runs for office again, I would vote for him

    1. Uhhh, No chance!
    2. Heck Yeah!
    2 votes
    Share Your Result

Comments

comments